The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered
Abstract
Abstract Rapid urbanization and industrialization has worsened the situation of the scarce cultivated land resources of China. It's therefore of great importance for sustainable development based on the systematic evaluation on cultivated land use efficiency (CLUE). This study took carbon emissions resulting from cultivated land use into the measurement framework of CLUE, and a slack-based measure (SBM) model with undesirable outputs, boxplot, kernel density estimation and Tobit regression model are adopted for the analysis of 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2017. The results showed that there was an increasing trend in CLUE in China from 0.5236 in 2000 to 0.8501 in 2017, with the growth rate of 38.40%. Most of provinces in China have much lower levels of CLUE with significantly spatial disparities. In particular, Hainan, Chongqing, Sichuan and Guizhou are always most efficient with the highest value of 1. At the regional level, the average value of CLUE in the northeastern region is the highest, followed by the western, eastern and central regions, and the CLUE in the eastern region is more unstable than the other three regions. The results of Tobit regression show that natural conditions, cultivated land resource endowments, agricultural production conditions, regional economic development and regional science and technology development are important factors resulting in the disparity of China's CLUE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 · Cited by 29,767
A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis
Tone, K. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00324-1 · Cited by 3,576
Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach
Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Ferreira, L., Grau, R., Mayaux, P., Meyfroidt, P., Morton, D. C., Rudel, T. K., Gasparri, I., & Munger, J. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.005 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuang, B., Lu, X., Zhou, M., & Chen, D.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 119874
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996621484
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119874
- The paper
- Kuang, B., Lu, X., Zhou, M., & Chen, D. (2020). Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.