The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and leading authors, institutions and countries in the 50 years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the basic criteria for bibliographic analysis is the index of countries that contribute most in this field [82,83].”
From Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector (2023) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21525 · Cited by 3,740
What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096 · Cited by 3,297
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 3,122
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2006) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · Cited by 2,751
Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”
Broadus, R. N. (1987) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016680 · Cited by 1,857
Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 · Cited by 1,416
Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630320302 · Cited by 1,232
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pagell, 2015, InCites' benchmarking and analytics, Online Searcher, 39, 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research
Kraus, S., Jones, P. K., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro‐Banegas, N., & Roig‐Tierno, N. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211047576 · Cited by 1,916
Self-citationDeep learning for precision agriculture: A bibliometric analysis
Coulibaly, S., Kamsu-Foguem, B., Kamissoko, D., & Traoré, D. (2022) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200102 · Cited by 158
From moon landing to metaverse: Tracing the evolution of Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Kraus, S., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Kaur, J., Sharma, A., & Schiavone, F. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122381 · Cited by 135
Berniak-Woźny, J., & Rataj, M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20020908 · Cited by 129
A bibliometric review of information technology, artificial intelligence, and blockchain on auditing
Huson, Y. A., Sierra‐García, L., & Benau, M. A. G. (2023) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2023.2256260 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., Porter, A., & Merigó, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sarin, Shikhar
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 165
- Pages
- 120487
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125681347
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2023-01-01)
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- technology forecasting, future studies, co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, leading authors, research institutions, country of origin, citation patterns, journal history, research collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review