The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Recent decades have witnessed increased number of studies focusing on digitalization and related capabilities. Across disciplines digitalization capability is viewed as a sources of sustained competiveness. Nonetheless, several issues related to conceptualizing digitalization capabilities remain ambivalent. The present study, uses co-citation analysis to clarify concept of digitalization capability and identify three underlining capabilities, namely digital integration capabilities, digital platform capabilities, and digital innovation capabilities, that represents micro-foundation of digitalization capabilities. Further, a capability-based model is developed which includes antecedents and consequences of digitalization capabilities in an integrated conceptual model. Suggestions for future research, theoretical contributions and managerial contributions are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036530 · Cited by 3,228
Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x · Cited by 2,799
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,600
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Barreto, I. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350776 · Cited by 1,948
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
ポーター, マ. E., ヘプルマン, ジ. E., & 有賀, 裕. (2015) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,550
(2015) · Cited by 1,282
Cited by
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Lee, M., Pak, A., & Roh, T. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3755 · Cited by 131
Growing with smart products: Why customization capabilities matter for manufacturing firms
Schulz, C., Kortmann, S., Piller, F. T., & Pollok, P. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12680 · Cited by 49
Jing, H., Zhang, Y., & Ma, J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21020 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., Nonino, F., Parida, V., & Pessot, E.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 120635
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3127264029
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 50.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635
- The paper
- Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., Nonino, F., Parida, V., & Pessot, E. (2021). Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
