Future applications of generative large language models: a data-driven case study on ChatGPT
Open accessAbstract
This study delves into the evolving role of generative Large Language Models (LLMs). We develop a data-driven approach to collect and analyse tasks that users are asking to generative LLMs. Thanks to the focus on tasks this paper contributes to give a quantitative and granular understanding of the potential influence of LLMs in different business areas. Utilizing a dataset comprising over 3.8 million tweets, we identify and cluster 31,747 unique tasks, with a specific case study on ChatGPT. To reach this goal, the proposed method combines two Natural Language Processing (NLP) Techniques, Named Entity Recognition (NER) and BERTopic. The combination makes it possible to collect granular tasks of LLMs (NER) and clusters them in business areas (BERTopic). Our findings reveal a wide spectrum of applications, from programming assistance to creative content generation, highlighting LLM's versatility. The analysis highlighted six emerging areas of application for ChatGPT: human resources, programming, social media, office automation, search engines, education. The study also examines the implications of these findings for innovation management, proposing a research agenda to explore the intersection of the identified areas, with four stages of the innovation process: idea generation, screening/idea selection, development, and diffusion/sales/marketing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Chiarello, F., Giordano, V., Spada, I., Barandoni, S., & Fantoni, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chiarello, Filippo
- Venue
- Technovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 133
- Pages
- 103002
- ISSN
- 0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393333034
- Semantic Scholar
- 7314d11ad399750f2b6eccc272993dae282e03b4
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 23
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- generative large language models, ChatGPT, user task analysis, task clustering, named entity recognition, BERTopic, Twitter, business applications of AI, programming assistance, content creation, human resources, office automation, innovation management, idea generation, diffusion of ideas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review