Cited by 99Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Platforms and EconomicsCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Why do people switch mobile payment service platforms? An empirical study in Taiwan

Kuo, Ren-Zong·2020·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 99

Authors
Kuo, R.-Z.
Affiliations
National Pingtung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Kuo, Ren-Zong
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
62
Pages
101312
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037005487
Cited by
99
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
mobile payment, switching intention, push-pull-mooring framework, alternative attractiveness, inertia, sunk costs, uncertainty costs, user retention, system quality, information quality, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review