Systematic literature reviews in cyberbullying/cyber harassment: A tertiary study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Instruments used to measure cyberbullying often do not align with the conceptualization of cyberbullying and lack adequate reliability and validity testing.
“For instance, instruments used to measure cyberbullying often do not align with the conceptualization of cyberbullying and lack adequate reliability and validity testing (50, 51).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
Existing measurement tools mirror conceptual ambiguities, contributing to variability in reported prevalence rates.
“As at present, existing measurement tools mirror these conceptual ambiguities, contributing to variability in reported prevalence rates (45, 47, 50).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Saleem, S., Khan, N. F., Zafar, S., & Raza, N.
- Affiliations
- Riphah International University (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Raza, Najla
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 102055
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283694752
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, online harassment, systematic reviews, systematic review quality, research trends, prevalence of cyberbullying, cyberbullying intervention, artificial intelligence, personality traits, socioeconomic factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
