Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social influence does not have significant effects on the behavioral intention to use information technology.
“This result is consistent with Kabra etal. (2017), for example, who did not find significant effects of social influence on the behavioral intention to use information technology.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Kabra et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 201
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Humphries, V. 2013. Improving Humanitarian Coordination: Common Challenges and Lessons Learned from the Cluster Approach. The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance.
- Kovács, G., Spens, K.M., 2007. Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 37, 99-114. doi:10.1108/09600030710734820 · DOI
- Authors
- Kabra, G., Ramesh, A., Akhtar, P., & Dash, M. K.
- Affiliations
- XIM University (IN)
- University of Hull (GB)
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kabra, Gaurav
- Venue
- Telematics and Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1250-1261
- ISSN
- 0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2618341982
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- technology adoption, humanitarian organizations, humanitarian supply chain, UTAUT, behavioral intention, personal innovativeness, trust in technology, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, disaster response, humanitarian workers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
