Examining the antecedents and consequences of mobile app engagement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers found that time convenience and interactivity can enhance users' relationship commitment with smartphone apps.
“For example, researchers found that time convenience and interactivity can enhance users' relationship commitment with smartphone apps (57).”
From Digital Therapeutic Alliance With Fully Automated Mental Health Smartphone Apps: A Narrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 203
- Authors
- Kim, S., & Baek, T. H.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baek, Tae Hyun
- Venue
- Telematics and Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-158
- ISSN
- 0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766950209
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 32.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- mobile marketing, interactivity, compatibility, relationship commitment, self-brand connection, moderating effect, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
