Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is a future-defining technology, and AI applications are becoming mainstream in the developed world. Many consumers are adopting and using AI-based apps, devices, and services in their everyday lives. However, research examining consumer behavior in using AI apps is scant. We examine critical factors in AI app adoption by extending and validating a well-established unified theory of adoption and use of technology, UTAUT2. We also explore the possibility of unobserved heterogeneity in consumers’ behavior, including potentially relevant segments of AI app adopters. To augment the knowledge of end users’ engagement and relevant segments, we have added two new antecedent variables into UTAUT2: technology fear and consumer trust. Prediction-orientated segmentation was used on 740 valid responses collected using a pre-tested survey instrument. The results show five segments with different behaviors that were influenced by the variables of the proposed model. Once known, the profiles were used to propose apps to AI developers to improve consumer engagement. The moderating effects of the added variables—technology fear and consumer trust—are also shown. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings and propose priorities for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The intention to use a technology directly predicts actual usage.
“Its core principle is that the intention to use technology directly predicts actual usage [19].”
From AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Shaikh, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Shaikh, Aijaz A.
- Venue
- Telematics and Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 101529
- ISSN
- 0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3102649365
- Semantic Scholar
- a164cd07be6345fb718e11d8ab2f80761b3d9f2e
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.fi
- Licence
- Locations
- Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence applications, consumer adoption, UTAUT2, consumer trust, customer segmentation, moderating effect, customer engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review