Cited by 146Technology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service InteractionsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables

Open access
Cabrera-Sánchez, Juan-Pedro, Villarejo-Ramos, Ángel F., Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco, Shaikh, Aijaz A.·2021·Telematics and Informatics

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is a future-defining technology, and AI applications are becoming mainstream in the developed world. Many consumers are adopting and using AI-based apps, devices, and services in their everyday lives. However, research examining consumer behavior in using AI apps is scant. We examine critical factors in AI app adoption by extending and validating a well-established unified theory of adoption and use of technology, UTAUT2. We also explore the possibility of unobserved heterogeneity in consumers’ behavior, including potentially relevant segments of AI app adopters. To augment the knowledge of end users’ engagement and relevant segments, we have added two new antecedent variables into UTAUT2: technology fear and consumer trust. Prediction-orientated segmentation was used on 740 valid responses collected using a pre-tested survey instrument. The results show five segments with different behaviors that were influenced by the variables of the proposed model. Once known, the profiles were used to propose apps to AI developers to improve consumer engagement. The moderating effects of the added variables—technology fear and consumer trust—are also shown. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings and propose priorities for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101529

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 115 · Cited by 146

Authors
Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Shaikh, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Shaikh, Aijaz A.
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
58
Pages
101529
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102649365
Cited by
146
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
artificial intelligence applications, consumer adoption, UTAUT2, consumer trust, customer segmentation, moderating effect, customer engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review