How socially anxious people become compulsive social media users: The role of fear of negative evaluation and rejection
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with social anxiety are more inclined to develop addictive tendencies towards excessive social media use.
“Previous research had proposed that individuals who experience social anxiety are more inclined to develop addictive tendencies towards the excessive use of social media that offers more control and comfort [21, 22].”
From Social media addiction and academic engagement as serial mediators between social anxiety and academic performance among college students (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Ali, F., Ali, A., Iqbal, A., & Ullah Zafar, A.
- Affiliations
- Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Hazara University (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Ali, Ayaz
- Venue
- Telematics and Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 63
- Pages
- 101658
- ISSN
- 0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3170870484
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- social interaction anxiety, social media addiction, fear of negative evaluation, fear of rejection, gender differences, mediation, university students, Chinese students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review