Cited by 41Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

How socially anxious people become compulsive social media users: The role of fear of negative evaluation and rejection

Ali, Fayaz, Ali, Ayaz, Iqbal, Amjad, Ullah Zafar, Abaid·2021·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101658

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 41

Authors
Ali, F., Ali, A., Iqbal, A., & Ullah Zafar, A.
Affiliations
  • Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Hazara University (PK)
Corresponding author
Ali, Ayaz
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
63
Pages
101658
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170870484
Cited by
41
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
social interaction anxiety, social media addiction, fear of negative evaluation, fear of rejection, gender differences, mediation, university students, Chinese students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review