Cited by 36Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Education

Generative artificial intelligence usage by researchers at work: Effects of gender, career stage, type of workplace, and perceived barriers

Open access
Dorta-González, Pablo, López-Puig, Alexis Jorge, Dorta-González, María Isabel, González-Betancor, Sara M.·2024·Telematics and Informatics

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence technology into research environments has become increasingly common in recent years, representing a significant shift in the way researchers approach their work. This paper seeks to explore the factors underlying the frequency of use of generative AI amongst researchers in their professional environments. As survey data may be influenced by a bias towards scientists interested in AI, potentially skewing the results towards the perspectives of these researchers, this study uses a regression model to isolate the impact of specific factors such as gender, career stage, type of workplace, and perceived barriers to using AI technology on the frequency of use of generative AI. It also controls for other relevant variables such as direct involvement in AI research or development, collaboration with AI companies, geographic location, and scientific discipline. Our results show that researchers who face barriers to AI adoption experience an 11 % increase in tool use, while those who cite insufficient training resources experience an 8 % decrease. Female researchers experience a 7 % decrease in AI tool usage compared to men, while advanced career researchers experience a significant 19 % decrease. Researchers associated with government advisory groups are 45 % more likely to use AI tools frequently than those in government roles. Researchers in for-profit companies show an increase of 19 %, while those in medical research institutions and hospitals show an increase of 16 % and 15 %, respectively. This paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving the use of generative AI tools amongst researchers, with valuable implications for both academia and industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2024.102187

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The survey items were developed for this study, informed by previous surveys of LLM use in other disciplines, key literature on LLM applications in mental health research, and the author team's expertise.

    “Items were developed for this study, informed by previous surveys of LLM use in other disciplines,16 17 key literature on LLM applications in mental health research14 and the author team’s expertise.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorta-González, P., López-Puig, A. J., Dorta-González, M. I., & González-Betancor, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
94
Pages
102187
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402115616
Cited by
36
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
generative AI, researchers, gender differences, career stages, workplace type, perceived barriers, training materials, for-profit corporations, medical research institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review