Gaming strategies in nursing education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A quasi-experiment among 98 nursing students at La Salle University examined how including four 20 min Kahoot! sessions would affect the final examination scores; the results showed that including these Kahoot! sessions had a significant impact on the final examination scores (p = .005).
“The results showed that including these Kahoot!sessions had a significant impact on the final examination scores (p ¼ .005).”
From The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Kinder & Kurz, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
“A quasi-experiment among 98 nursing students at La Salle University examined how including four 20 min Kahoot! sessions would affect the final examination scores (Kinder & Kurz, 2018).”
BackgroundKahoot! Game‐based digital learning platform: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
Özdemir, O. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13084 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kinder, F. D., & Kurz, J. M.
- Affiliations
- La Salle University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kurz, Jane M.
- ORCID
- Kurz, Jane M.
- Venue
- Teaching and Learning in Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-214
- ISSN
- 1557-2013 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3087
- OpenAlex
- W2805897105
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching and learning in nursing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- game-based learning, nursing students, final exam performance, student engagement, gamification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
