Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Innovations in Medical EducationMedical Education and AdmissionsNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remediation for NCLEX-RN success in high-risk nursing students

Meehan, Carolyn D., Barker, Nancy·2021·Teaching and learning in nursing
DOI 10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Background: The National Council Licensure Exam (NCLEX-RN) pass rate is often used as a measurement to determine a successful undergraduate nursing program. Students that are not successful in the first attempt of taking this exam are statistically unlikely to pass on the second attempt. Purpose: To determine if the implementation of a prescribed remediation protocol would improve undergraduate baccalaureate predictor scores for passing the NCLEX-RN exam on the first attempt for high-risk students. Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was used to compare scores of nursing students after a prescribed remediation protocol was instituted. Results: A one-way ANOVA test was conducted to compare the effect of a remediation policy on nursing students enrolled in an undergraduate nursing program. Remediation had a significant effect at the p Conclusion: A prescribed remediation protocol assisted students in achieving the necessary scores on the Comprehensive Predictor exam to increase their likelihood of success on NCLEX.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pettit-O'Malley, 2017, The relative efficacy of handwritten versus electronic student classroom notes, Business Education Innovation Journal, 9, 110

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Meehan, C. D., & Barker, N.
Affiliations
West Chester University (US)
Corresponding author
Meehan, Carolyn D.
ORCID
Venue
Teaching and learning in nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
254-257
ISSN
  • 1557-2013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3087
DOI
10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.003
OpenAlex
W3134842298
Cited by
14
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
Teaching and learning in nursing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
NCLEX-RN, nursing licensure examination, baccalaureate nursing students, nursing education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.