Cited by 194Estrogen and related hormone effectsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsProstate Cancer Treatment and Research

Progesterone: the ultimate endometrial tumor suppressor

Open access
Yang, Shujie, Thiel, Kristina W., Leslie, Kimberly K.·2011·Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The uterine endometrium is exquisitely sensitive to steroid hormones that act through well-described nuclear receptors. Estrogen drives epithelial proliferation, and progesterone inhibits growth and causes cell differentiation. The importance of progesterone as a key inhibitor of carcinogenesis is reflected by the observation that women who ovulate and produce progesterone almost never get endometrial cancer. In this review we describe seminal research findings that define progesterone as the major endometrial tumor suppressor. We discuss the genes and diverse signaling pathways that are controlled by progesterone through progesterone receptors (PRs) and also the multiple factors that regulate progesterone/PR activity. By defining these progesterone-regulated factors and pathways we identify the principal therapeutic opportunities to control the growth of endometrial cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tem.2011.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 194

Authors
Yang, S., Thiel, K. W., & Leslie, K. K.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Leslie, Kimberly K.
Venue
Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
145-152
ISSN
1043-2760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050276596
Cited by
194
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA27469, R01CA099908, U10CA027469, CA 99908)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Keywords
progesterone, endometrial cancer, tumor suppression, progesterone receptor, nuclear receptors, steroid hormone signaling, estrogen, cell differentiation, carcinogenesis, endometrium, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Progestins, Progesterone, Receptors, Progesterone, Endometrial Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review