Reducing Type 1 Diabetes Mortality: Role for Adjunctive Therapies?
Abstract
Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) frequently fail to achieve glycemic goals and have excess cardiovascular risk and premature death. Adjunctive agents may play a role in reducing morbidity, mortality, and the adverse sequelae of insulin treatment. A surge in type 2 diabetes drug development has revealed agents with benefits beyond glucose lowering, including cardiovascular risk reduction. Could these benefits translate to T1D? Specific trials for T1D demonstrate substantial hemoglobin (Hb)A1c reductions with sodium glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLTis) and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)1 agonists, and modest improvements with metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), and pramlintide. Studies exploring cardiovascular risk reduction are warranted. This review synthesizes the emerging literature for researchers and clinicians treating people with T1D. Challenges in T1D research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In phase III programs in people with type 1 diabetes, SGLT-1 or SGLT-1/2 inhibitors reduced HbA1c, improved TIR, reduced body weight, and improved blood pressure.
“In several phase III programs in people with type 1 diabetes, the use of SGLT-1 or SGLT-1/2 inhibitors reduced HbA 1c , improved TIR, reduced body weight, and improved blood pressure (244).”
Metformin has been evaluated in numerous small trials in people with type 1 diabetes with hopes that its insulin-sensitizing properties would improve glycemic management and/or reduce cardiovascular risk.
“Metformin has been evaluated in numerous small trials in people with type 1 diabetes with hopes that its insulin-sensitizing properties would improve glycemic management and/or reduce cardiovascular risk (244,245).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Snaith, J. R., Holmes-Walker, D. J., & Greenfield, J. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Greenfield, Jerry R.
- Venue
- Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-164
- ISSN
- 1043-2760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2992847844
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of New South Wales
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, mortality reduction, adjunctive therapy, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk, sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, pramlintide, HbA1c
- MeSH terms
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Incretins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review