Cited by 7Agroforestry and silvopastoral systemsIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water productivity of tree wind break agroforestry systems in irrigated agriculture – An example from Ferghana Valley, Kyrgyzstan

Open access
Thevs, Niels, Aliev, Kumar, Lleshi, Roland·2021·Trees, Forests and People

Abstract

Central Asia is largely dominated by drylands; so agriculture depends on irrigation in most parts of the region, which results in large scale water withdrawal, mainly from rivers, and, consequently, water scarcity. Climate change is expected to aggravate such water shortages as river flows are predicted to be substantially reduced during the second half of this century, which will put additional strain on irrigated agriculture. Tree wind breaks are one option to reduce water consumption in irrigated agriculture, add to farm income, and are therefore prioritized by government policies. Still, many farmers fear that tree wind breaks may compromise crop yields and income. Therefore, based on preceding studies this paper investigates the water productivity – net present value by unit of water consumed – of tree wind break systems of single row tree rows combined with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) compared with those crops under open field conditions. The tree wind break systems attained higher water productivities across all crops, different discount rates, tree ages of tree wind breaks, and varying crop yields. Tree wind break systems at 200 m spacing attained higher water productivities than those at 1000 m spacing. In conclusion, tree wind breaks can be inserted into the irrigated agriculture as an additional source of farm income, source for wood resources, and help reducing overall water consumption in irrigated agriculture. Simple tree lines are put forward, as multiple tree rows have been shown not to attain financial gains and save less water than the single tree lines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Alemu, 2016, Ecological benefits of trees as windbreaks and shelterbelts, Int. J. Ecosyst., 6, 10
  2. Baier, C., Thevs, N., Villwock, D., Emileva, B., Fischer, S. (2021): Water Productivity of Paulownia Tomentosa x Fortunei (Shan Tong) in a Plantation at Lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Submitted to Trees. · DOI
  3. Baker, T.P., Moroni, M.T., Mendham, D.S., Smith, R., Hunt, M.A. (2018): Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production. Crop Pasture Sci. 69: 785-796. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17242. · DOI
  4. Cleugh, 2002, The Australian National Windbreaks Program: overview and summary of results, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 42, 649, 10.1071/EA02003 · DOI
  5. Dwivedi, 2007, Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in western Uttar Pradesh, Indian Res. J. Extention Educ., 7, 18
  6. Granier, 1985, Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres, Ann. Sci. Forestry EDP Sci., 42, 193, 10.1051/forest:19850204 · DOI
  7. Jain, 2000, Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar (Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India), Agrofor. Syst., 49, 255, 10.1023/A:1006388128069 · DOI
  8. Khamzina, 2009, Transpiration and early growth of tree plantations established on degraded cropland over shallow saline groundwater table in northwest Uzbekistan, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1865, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.015 · DOI
  9. Kort, 1988, Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 22/23, 165, 10.1016/0167-8809(88)90017-5 · DOI
  10. Karthe, 2018, Environmental changes in central and east Asian drylands and their effects on large central and east Asian lakes and their effects on major river-lake systems, Quat. Int., 475, 91, 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.041 · DOI
  11. Li, 2020, Optimizing the quantity and spatial patterns of farmland shelter forests increases cotton productivity in arid lands, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 292, 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106832 · DOI
  12. Liu, 2018, Water consumption by an agroecosystem with shelter forests of corn and Populus in the North China Plain, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 265, 178, 10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.027 · DOI
  13. Oishi, 2016, Baseliner. An open-source, interactive tool for processing sap flux data from thermal dissipation probes, SoftwareX, 5, 139, 10.1016/j.softx.2016.07.003 · DOI
  14. Peri, 2002, Windbreaks in southern Patagonia, Argentina: a review of research on growth models, windspeed reduction, and effects on crops, Agrofor. Syst., 56, 129, 10.1023/A:1021314927209 · DOI
  15. Reyer, 2017, Climate change impacts in Central Asia and their implications for development, Reg. Environ. Change, 2017, 1639, 10.1007/s10113-015-0893-z · DOI
  16. Ruppert, 2020, Farmers’ perceptions of tree shelterbelts on agricultural land in rural Kyrgyzstan, Sustainability, 12, 1093, 10.3390/su12031093 · DOI
  17. Schroeder, 1989, Shelterbelts in the Soviet Union, J. Soil Water Conserv., 44, 130, 10.1080/00224561.1989.12456297 · DOI
  18. Smith, 2021, Windbreaks in the United States: a systematic review of producer-reported benefits, challenges, management activities and drivers of adoption, Agric. Syst., 187, 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103032 · DOI
  19. Strenge, 2018, Water consumption of Populus alba trees in tree shelterbelt systems in Central Asia, Cent. Asian J. Water Resour., 4, 48, 10.29258/CAJWR/2018-RI.v4-1/48-62.eng · DOI
  20. Thevs, 2017, Tree shelterbelts as an element to improve water resource management in Central Asia, Water, 9, 842, 10.3390/w9110842 · DOI
  21. Thevs, 2019, Tree wind breaks in Central Asia and their effects on agricultural water consumption, Land, 8, 167, 10.3390/land8110167 · DOI
  22. Thevs, 2021, Agro-economy of tree wind break systems in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia, Agrofor. Syst.
  23. Thevs, N., Fehrenz, S., Aliev, A., Emileva, B., Fazylbekov, R., Kentbaev, Y., Qonunov, Y., Qurbonbekova, Y., Raissova, N., Razhapbaev, M., Zikirov, S. (2021): Growth Rates of Poplar Clones Across Central Asia. Submitted to Forests. · DOI
  24. Thomas, 2006, Water use by perennial plants in the transition zone between river oasis and desert in NW China, Basic Appl. Ecol., 7, 253, 10.1016/j.baae.2005.07.008 · DOI
  25. Unger-Shayesteh, 2013, What do we know about past changes in the water cycle of Central Asian headwaters? A review, Glob. Planet. Change, 110, 4, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.02.004 · DOI
  26. Zotarelli, L., Dukes, M.D., Romero, C.C., Migliaccio, K.W. and Morgan, K.T. (2010): Step by Step Calculation of the Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration (FAO-56 Method). https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/ae/ae45900.pdf (accessed on 04 July 2019). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review

    Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96

    “…crops resulted in positive or negative outcomes for net present value compared to a system without windbreaks depending on the crop involved (Thevs et al. 2021), whereas in a study in Myanmar, the terracing system under different Wa-u cultivation methods compared to swidden agriculture…”

Metadata

Authors
Thevs, N., Aliev, K., & Lleshi, R.
Affiliations
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (DE)
  • Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (DE)
Corresponding author
Thevs, Niels
Venue
Trees, Forests and People
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
4
Pages
100085
ISSN
2666-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3150878523
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trees Forests and People (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
  • Fundación para la Innovación Agraria
  • Federal Ministry of Economic Co-operation and Development (81206861)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
Keywords
agroforestry, water productivity, irrigated agriculture, cotton, maize, rice, net present value, water consumption, arid regions, Fergana Valley, climate change impacts on water resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review