The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Water productivity of tree wind break agroforestry systems in irrigated agriculture – An example from Ferghana Valley, Kyrgyzstan
Open accessAbstract
Central Asia is largely dominated by drylands; so agriculture depends on irrigation in most parts of the region, which results in large scale water withdrawal, mainly from rivers, and, consequently, water scarcity. Climate change is expected to aggravate such water shortages as river flows are predicted to be substantially reduced during the second half of this century, which will put additional strain on irrigated agriculture. Tree wind breaks are one option to reduce water consumption in irrigated agriculture, add to farm income, and are therefore prioritized by government policies. Still, many farmers fear that tree wind breaks may compromise crop yields and income. Therefore, based on preceding studies this paper investigates the water productivity – net present value by unit of water consumed – of tree wind break systems of single row tree rows combined with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) compared with those crops under open field conditions. The tree wind break systems attained higher water productivities across all crops, different discount rates, tree ages of tree wind breaks, and varying crop yields. Tree wind break systems at 200 m spacing attained higher water productivities than those at 1000 m spacing. In conclusion, tree wind breaks can be inserted into the irrigated agriculture as an additional source of farm income, source for wood resources, and help reducing overall water consumption in irrigated agriculture. Simple tree lines are put forward, as multiple tree rows have been shown not to attain financial gains and save less water than the single tree lines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in a study in the Kyrgyz Republic, a windbreak system under different crops resulted in positive or negative outcomes for net present value compared to a system without windbreaks depending on the crop involved (Thevs et al. 2021)”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Thevs et al. 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Alemu, 2016, Ecological benefits of trees as windbreaks and shelterbelts, Int. J. Ecosyst., 6, 10
- Baier, C., Thevs, N., Villwock, D., Emileva, B., Fischer, S. (2021): Water Productivity of Paulownia Tomentosa x Fortunei (Shan Tong) in a Plantation at Lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Submitted to Trees. · DOI
- Baker, T.P., Moroni, M.T., Mendham, D.S., Smith, R., Hunt, M.A. (2018): Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production. Crop Pasture Sci. 69: 785-796. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17242. · DOI
- Cleugh, 2002, The Australian National Windbreaks Program: overview and summary of results, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 42, 649, 10.1071/EA02003 · DOI
- Dwivedi, 2007, Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in western Uttar Pradesh, Indian Res. J. Extention Educ., 7, 18
- Granier, 1985, Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres, Ann. Sci. Forestry EDP Sci., 42, 193, 10.1051/forest:19850204 · DOI
- Jain, 2000, Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar (Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India), Agrofor. Syst., 49, 255, 10.1023/A:1006388128069 · DOI
- Khamzina, 2009, Transpiration and early growth of tree plantations established on degraded cropland over shallow saline groundwater table in northwest Uzbekistan, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1865, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.015 · DOI
- Kort, 1988, Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 22/23, 165, 10.1016/0167-8809(88)90017-5 · DOI
- Karthe, 2018, Environmental changes in central and east Asian drylands and their effects on large central and east Asian lakes and their effects on major river-lake systems, Quat. Int., 475, 91, 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.041 · DOI
- Li, 2020, Optimizing the quantity and spatial patterns of farmland shelter forests increases cotton productivity in arid lands, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 292, 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106832 · DOI
- Liu, 2018, Water consumption by an agroecosystem with shelter forests of corn and Populus in the North China Plain, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 265, 178, 10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.027 · DOI
- Oishi, 2016, Baseliner. An open-source, interactive tool for processing sap flux data from thermal dissipation probes, SoftwareX, 5, 139, 10.1016/j.softx.2016.07.003 · DOI
- Peri, 2002, Windbreaks in southern Patagonia, Argentina: a review of research on growth models, windspeed reduction, and effects on crops, Agrofor. Syst., 56, 129, 10.1023/A:1021314927209 · DOI
- Reyer, 2017, Climate change impacts in Central Asia and their implications for development, Reg. Environ. Change, 2017, 1639, 10.1007/s10113-015-0893-z · DOI
- Ruppert, 2020, Farmers’ perceptions of tree shelterbelts on agricultural land in rural Kyrgyzstan, Sustainability, 12, 1093, 10.3390/su12031093 · DOI
- Schroeder, 1989, Shelterbelts in the Soviet Union, J. Soil Water Conserv., 44, 130, 10.1080/00224561.1989.12456297 · DOI
- Smith, 2021, Windbreaks in the United States: a systematic review of producer-reported benefits, challenges, management activities and drivers of adoption, Agric. Syst., 187, 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103032 · DOI
- Strenge, 2018, Water consumption of Populus alba trees in tree shelterbelt systems in Central Asia, Cent. Asian J. Water Resour., 4, 48, 10.29258/CAJWR/2018-RI.v4-1/48-62.eng · DOI
- Thevs, 2017, Tree shelterbelts as an element to improve water resource management in Central Asia, Water, 9, 842, 10.3390/w9110842 · DOI
- Thevs, 2019, Tree wind breaks in Central Asia and their effects on agricultural water consumption, Land, 8, 167, 10.3390/land8110167 · DOI
- Thevs, 2021, Agro-economy of tree wind break systems in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia, Agrofor. Syst.
- Thevs, N., Fehrenz, S., Aliev, A., Emileva, B., Fazylbekov, R., Kentbaev, Y., Qonunov, Y., Qurbonbekova, Y., Raissova, N., Razhapbaev, M., Zikirov, S. (2021): Growth Rates of Poplar Clones Across Central Asia. Submitted to Forests. · DOI
- Thomas, 2006, Water use by perennial plants in the transition zone between river oasis and desert in NW China, Basic Appl. Ecol., 7, 253, 10.1016/j.baae.2005.07.008 · DOI
- Unger-Shayesteh, 2013, What do we know about past changes in the water cycle of Central Asian headwaters? A review, Glob. Planet. Change, 110, 4, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.02.004 · DOI
- Zotarelli, L., Dukes, M.D., Romero, C.C., Migliaccio, K.W. and Morgan, K.T. (2010): Step by Step Calculation of the Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration (FAO-56 Method). https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/ae/ae45900.pdf (accessed on 04 July 2019). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96
“…crops resulted in positive or negative outcomes for net present value compared to a system without windbreaks depending on the crop involved (Thevs et al. 2021), whereas in a study in Myanmar, the terracing system under different Wa-u cultivation methods compared to swidden agriculture…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Thevs, N., Aliev, K., & Lleshi, R.
- Affiliations
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (DE)
- Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Thevs, Niels
- Venue
- Trees, Forests and People
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 100085
- ISSN
- 2666-7193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3150878523
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trees Forests and People (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
- Fundación para la Innovación Agraria
- Federal Ministry of Economic Co-operation and Development (81206861)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- agroforestry, water productivity, irrigated agriculture, cotton, maize, rice, net present value, water consumption, arid regions, Fergana Valley, climate change impacts on water resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review