Cited by 45Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisComplex Network Analysis TechniquesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Geometric robustness theory and biological networks

Open access
AY, N, KRAKAUER, D·2006·Theory in Biosciences

Abstract

We provide a geometric framework for investigating the robustness of information flows over biological networks. We use information measures to quantify the impact of knockout perturbations on simple networks. Robustness has two components, a measure of the causal contribution of a node or nodes, and a measure of the change or exclusion dependence, of the network following node removal. Causality is measured as statistical contribution of a node to network function, whereas exclusion dependence measures a distance between unperturbed network and reconfigured network function. We explore the role that redundancy plays in increasing robustness, and how redundacy can be exploited through error-correcting codes implemented by networks. We provide examples of the robustness measure when applied to familiar boolean functions such as the AND, OR and XOR functions. We discuss the relationship between robustness measures and related measures of complexity and how robustness always implies a minimal level of complexity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.thbio.2006.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emergence at living scales is best thought of in terms of mechanisms of protection, or robustness, against large perturbations enabling the effective equations of motion regulating biomolecules and their aggregates.

    “Emergence at living scales is perhaps best thought of in terms of mechanisms of protection, or robustness [11], against large perturbations enabling the ‘effective’ equations of motion regulating biomolecules and their aggregates.”

    From Symmetry–simplicity, broken symmetry–complexity (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 45

Authors
AY, N., & KRAKAUER, D.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences (DE)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
Corresponding author
AY, N
Venue
Theory in Biosciences
Published
2006-08-02
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
93-121
ISSN
1431-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060562744
Cited by
45
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Theory in Biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
network robustness, biological networks, information flow, information measures, causal contribution, redundancy, error-correcting codes, Boolean functions, network complexity
MeSH terms
Information Theory, Models, Biological, Stochastic Processes, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review