Cited by 37Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Incretin-based drugs and intestinal obstruction: A pharmacovigilance study

Open access
Gudin, Bastien, Ladhari, Chayma, Robin, Perrine, Laroche, Marie-Laure, Babai, Samy, Hillaire-Buys, Dominique, Faillie, Jean-Luc·2020·Therapies

Abstract

Aims To investigate the risk of intestinal obstruction associated with incretin-based drugs by performing a disproportionality analysis of adverse reaction reports in a global pharmacovigilance database. Methods We conducted a case/non-case analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's adverse drug reactions (ADR) database, to assess intestinal obstruction reporting associated with incretin-based drugs (glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues [GLP-1a] and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors [DPP-4i]. Cases were defined as reports of gastrointestinal stenosis and obstruction (MedDRA High Level Group Term) and non-cases were all other reactions recorded. Disproportionality analysis were performed by computing reporting odds ratios (ROR) with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) within all ADR reports concerning diabetes drugs from January 2007 to January 2018 and in a restricted sample including only serious reports. Results A total of 501,244 ADR with diabetes drugs were reported in VigiBase during the study period. We identified 452 intestinal obstructions involving an incretin-based drug. In disproportionality analyses, intestinal obstructions were more than 4.5 times more frequently reported with incretin-based drugs than with other diabetes drugs (ROR 4.52, 95% CI: 3.87-5.28) with a higher signal for serious cases and for DPP-4i (ROR 8.66, 95% CI: 7.27-10.32) compared to GLP-1a (ROR 3.05, 95% CI: 2.54-3.66). Conclusions We identified a pharmacovigilance signal that suggests a risk of potentially serious intestinal obstruction associated with incretin-based drugs, as a class and with a greater signal for DPP4-i. Other studies are needed to confirm and better understand the potential risk of intestinal obstruction associated with incretin-based drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.therap.2020.02.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gudin, B., Ladhari, C., Robin, P., Laroche, M.-L., Babai, S., Hillaire-Buys, D., & Faillie, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Faillie, Jean-Luc
Venue
Therapies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
641-647
ISSN
0040-5957 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025180230
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Therapies (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
incretin-based drugs, intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal stenosis, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues, DPP-4 inhibitors, adverse drug reactions, drug safety signals, diabetes drugs, disproportionality analysis
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Intestinal Obstruction, Databases, Factual, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Incretins, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Pharmacovigilance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review