Cited by 42Reproductive Physiology in LivestockAnimal Genetics and ReproductionReproductive Biology and Fertility

The importance and potential of artificial insemination in CANDES (companion animals, non-domestic, endangered species)

Durrant, B.S.·2009·Theriogenology

Abstract

Artificial insemination (AI) is the least invasive assisted reproductive technology, and is therefore of great interest to breeders of companion animals, non-domestic, and endangered species (CANDES). This most fundamental artificial breeding technique circumvents physical or behavioral impediments to natural mating and provides the means for genetic exchange between populations without transfer of live animals. In addition, because oocytes grow, mature and are fertilized in vivo and embryos are not subjected to in vitro culture conditions, AI eliminates the epigenetic effects on the female gamete that are inherent in more invasive assisted reproductive technologies. Although the management of CANDES differs significantly from current livestock husbandry practices, the cattle industry is a powerful example of the potential for AI to enhance the genetic health and sustainability of animal populations. Ultimately, successful AI requires sperm of adequate quality and quantity, oocytes that have attained nuclear maturation and cytoplasmic competence, operational gamete transport systems, accurate timing, and proper placement of sperm in the female reproductive tract. Increased understanding of semen collection, evaluation and preservation techniques, estrus synchronization and superovulation, estrus and ovulation detection, and insemination instrumentation is needed for each CANDES before AI success rates will approach those of the livestock industry. Concentrated, collaborative research in these areas must be encouraged among private breeders, universities and zoological institutions to realize the full potential of AI in the management of CANDES.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durrant, B. S.
Affiliations
Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Durrant, B.S.
Venue
Theriogenology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
113-122
ISSN
0093-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088540776
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theriogenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
artificial insemination, companion animals, threatened species, assisted reproduction, oocyte nuclear maturation, epigenetic effects, estrus synchronization, superovulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Seasons, Sex Preselection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review