Cited by 83Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Physiology in LivestockAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

First successful artificial insemination with frozen-thawed semen in rhinoceros

Hermes, R., Göritz, F., Saragusty, J., Sós, E., Molnar, V., Reid, C.E., Schwarzenberger, F., Hildebrandt, T.B.·2009·Theriogenology

Abstract

The first successful artificial insemination (AI) in a rhinoceros was reported in 2007 using fresh semen. Following that success, we decided to evaluate the possibility of using frozen-thawed semen for artificial insemination. Semen, collected from a 35-36 year old Southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum) in the UK was frozen using the directional freezing technique. This frozen semen was used in two intrauterine AI attempts on a 30 years old female rhinoceros in Hungary. The first attempt, conducted 30 days postpartum with an insemination dose of approximately 135 x 10(6) motile cells, failed. The second attempt, conducted two estrus cycles later with an insemination dose of approximately 500 x 10(6) motile cells, resulted in pregnancy and the birth of a healthy offspring. This represents the first successful AI using frozen-thawed semen in a rhinoceros, putting it among very few wildlife species in which AI with frozen-thawed semen resulted in a live birth. The incorporation of AI with frozen-thawed semen into the assisted reproduction toolbox opens the way to preserve and transport semen between distant individuals in captivity or between wild and captive populations, without the need to transport stressed or potentially disease carrying animals. In addition, cryopreserved spermatozoa, in combination with AI, are useful methods to extend the reproductive lifespan of individuals beyond their biological lifespan and an important tool for managing genetic diversity in these endangered mammals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.10.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hermes, R., Göritz, F., Saragusty, J., Sós, E., Molnar, V., Reid, C. E., Schwarzenberger, F., & Hildebrandt, T. B.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Hermes, R.
Venue
Theriogenology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
393-399
ISSN
0093-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066279881
Cited by
83
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theriogenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
artificial insemination, frozen semen, rhinoceros, white rhinoceros, Ceratotherium simum simum, directional freezing, intrauterine insemination, sperm cryopreservation, assisted reproduction, endangered species conservation, genetic diversity management
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Freezing, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Perissodactyla, Pregnancy, Semen, Semen Preservation, Cryopreservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review