Cited by 79

Contaminated liquid nitrogen vapour as a risk factor in pathogen transfer

Grout, B.W.W., Morris, G.J.·2009·Theriogenology

Abstract

Liquid nitrogen in storage containers will gather particulate matter from the atmosphere, or the surfaces of containers placed into it, with time. Some of these accumulating particles may be pathogenic organisms and it can be demonstrated that their viability may be conserved by immersion in the liquid nitrogen. This contamination constitutes a risk to the status of stored samples that can, largely, be avoided by the use of appropriate techniques for sealing sample containers and sterilizing their outer surfaces. The present study uses fungal spores and organic crystals to demonstrate that such particles contained in liquid nitrogen are released back into the environment when nitrogen vapour cools programmable freezers or dry shippers. This demonstrates that storage in the vapour phase above liquid nitrogen still carries a real risk of sample, or facility, contamination. Regardless of the safety of the stored sample, this is a potential source of cross-contamination between repositories or experimental sites, both locally and internationally, that could have serious consequences in clinical and agricultural situations. This study provides evidence to suggest that this possibility, as yet unquantified, should be included in risk analysis of storage protocols for reproductive materials. The risk becomes diverse when, for example, semen and embryos are frozen at an agricultural site and the dry shipper can co-transport spores of contaminating crop plant pathogens to the destinat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential sources of viral contamination include the operator, cell culture reagents of animal origin, cells or tissues of human origin (including feeder cells), and even contamination derived from liquid nitrogen storage vessels.

    “In cell culture, there are also various potential sources of viral contamination, including the operator, cell culture reagents of animal origin, cells or tissues of human origin (including feeder cells), and even contamination derived from liquid nitrogen storage vessels (Fountain et al., 1997; Grout and Morris, 2009; Morris, 2005).”

    From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Grout and Morris, 2009

Cited by

Authors
Grout, B. W. W., & Morris, G. J.
Venue
Theriogenology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
1079-1082
ISSN
0093-691X
Cited by
79
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review