Anticardiolipin and anti-β2glycoprotein-I antibody cut-off values in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: more than calculating the in-house 99th percentiles, even for new automated assays
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In-house calculated cutoff values may differ significantly from those recommended by manufacturers.
“In-house calculated cutoff values may be significantly different from those recommended by the manufacturers.[70][71][72]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Devreese, K. M. J., & Van Hoecke, F.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Devreese, Katrien M.J.
- Venue
- Thrombosis Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 598-600
- ISSN
- 0049-3848 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056423224
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thrombosis Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- antiphospholipid syndrome, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, cut-off values, 99th percentile, automated immunoassay, lupus anticoagulant, ELISA, assay standardization
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, beta 2-Glycoprotein I
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review