Cited by 1,044Cell death mechanisms and regulationMitochondrial Function and PathologyAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Cell death by necrosis: towards a molecular definition

Golstein, Pierre, Kroemer, Guido·2007·Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Abstract

Necrosis has been defined as a type of cell death that lacks the features of apoptosis and autophagy, and is usually considered to be uncontrolled. Recent research suggests, however, that its occurrence and course might be tightly regulated. After signaling- or damage-induced lesions, necrosis can include signs of controlled processes such as mitochondrial dysfunction, enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species, ATP depletion, proteolysis by calpains and cathepsins, and early plasma membrane rupture. In addition, the inhibition of specific proteins involved in regulating apoptosis or autophagy can change the type of cell death to necrosis. Because necrosis is prominent in ischemia, trauma and possibly some forms of neurodegeneration, further biochemical comprehension and molecular definition of this process could have important clinical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mitotic catastrophe leads to cell death during or after mitosis and is discernible by multi- or micronucleation and/or mitotic arrest.

    “Mitotic catastrophe leads to cell death during or after mitosis and is morphologically discernible by multi- or micronucleation and/or mitotic arrest before the cells adopts an apoptotic or necrotic aspects 113.”

    From Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death (2009) · cites this paper as [113]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 1,044

Authors
Golstein, P., & Kroemer, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Kroemer, Guido
Venue
Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
0968-0004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133669258
Cited by
1,044
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 85
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Biochemical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
necrosis, cell death, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species, ATP depletion, calpain, cathepsins, plasma membrane rupture, apoptosis regulation, autophagy regulation, ischemia, trauma (physical injury), neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase F, Animals, Calpain, Cathepsins, Humans, Necrosis, Cell Death, Caenorhabditis elegans, Cyclophilins, Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review