Cited by 52

Animal‐friendly affinity reagents: replacing the needless in the haystack

Gray, A.C., Sidhu, S.S., Chandrasekera, P.C., Hendriksen, C.F.M., Borrebaeck, C.A.K.·2016·Trends in Biotechnology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other animal-derived materials and reagents, such as Matrigel, collagen from diverse animal origins, and animal-derived antibodies, result in significant animal welfare concerns, which are in opposition to the original 3Rs principle.

    “Other animal‐derived materials and reagents, such as Matrigel™ (a basement membrane preparation derived from the Engelbreth‐Holm‐Swarm sarcoma grown and propagated in mice), collagen from diverse animal origins, and animal‐derived antibodies, also results in significant animal welfare concerns, which are in opposition to the original 3Rs principle [17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [2]2. Leenaars, P.P. ... Assessment of side effects induced by injection of different adjuvant–antigen combinations in rabbits and mice Lab. Anim. 1998; 32:387-406 Crossref Scopus (75) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [3]3. Marx, U. ... Monoclonal antibody production ATLA. 1997; 25:121-137 Google Scholar
  3. [4]4. Leenaars, M. ... The production of polyclonal antibodies in laboratory animals ATLA. 1999; 27:79-102 Google Scholar
  4. [6]6. Taussig, M.J. ... ProteomeBinders: planning a European resource of affinity reagents for analysis of the human proteome Nat. Methods. 2007; 4:13-17 Crossref Scopus (216) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [7]7. Hust, M. ... A human ScFv Ab generation pipeline for proteome research J. Biotechnol. 2011; 152:159-170 Crossref Scopus (111) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [12]12. Dübel, S. ... Generating recombinant antibodies to the complete human proteome Trends Biotechnol. 2010; 28:333-339 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (88) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [13]13. Marx, V. Calling the next generation of affinity reagents Nat. Methods. 2013; 10:703-707 Crossref Scopus (86) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [14]14. Proetzel, G. ∙ Ebersbach, H. (Editors) Antibody Methods and Protocols Humana Press, 2012 Crossref Google Scholar
  9. [15]15. Aitken, R. (Editor) Antibody Phage Display Methods and Protocols Humana Press, 2009 Crossref Google Scholar
  10. [16]16. Hust, M. ... Construction of human naive antibody gene libraries Methods Mol. Biol. 2012; 907:85-107 Crossref Scopus (19) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [19]19. Sidhu, S.S. ∙ Fellouse, F.A. Synthetic therapeutic antibodies Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006; 2:682-688 Crossref Scopus (125) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [20]20. Frenzel, A. ... Generating recombinant antibodies for research, diagnostics and therapy using phage display Curr. Biotechnol. 2012; 1:33-41 Crossref Google Scholar
  13. [21]21. Altshuler, E.P. ... Generation of recombinant antibodies and means for increasing their affinity Biochemistry (Mosc.). 2010; 13:1584-1605 Crossref Scopus (26) Google Scholar
  14. [22]22. Borrebaeck, C.A.K. ∙ Ohlin, M. Antibody evolution beyond nature Nat. Biotechnol. 2002; 20:1189-1190 Crossref Scopus (31) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [23]23. Söderlind, E. ... Recombining germline-derived CDR sequences for creating diverse single framework antibody libraries Nat. Biotechnol. 2000; 18:852-856 Crossref Scopus (281) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [24]24. Igawa, T. ... Engineering the variable region of therapeutic IgG antibodies MAbs. 2011; 3:243-252 Crossref Scopus (134) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [25]25. Bradbury, A. ... Beyond natural antibodies, the power of in vitro display technologies Nat. Biotechnol. 2011; 29:245-254 Crossref Scopus (447) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [26]26. Schirrmann, T. ... Phage display for the generation of antibodies for proteome research, diagnostics and therapy Molecules. 2011; 16:412-426 Crossref Scopus (101) PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [27]27. Pershad, K. ... Generating a panel of highly specific antibodies to 20 human SH2 domains by phage display Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2010; 23:279-288 Crossref Scopus (45) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [28]28. Dantas-Barbosa, C. ... Antibody phage display libraries: contributions to oncology Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012; 13:5420-5440 Crossref Scopus (33) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [29]29. Kirkpatrick, P. Specificity concerns with antibodies for receptor mapping Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009; 8:278 Crossref Scopus (24) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [30]30. Pozner-Moulis, S. ... Antibody validation by quantitative analysis of protein expression using expression of Met in breast cancer as a model Lab. Invest. 2007; 87:251-260 Crossref Scopus (52) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, A. C., Sidhu, S. S., Chandrasekera, P. C., Hendriksen, C. F. M., & Borrebaeck, C. A. K.
Venue
Trends in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
960-969
ISSN
0167-7799
Cited by
52
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review