Improving Biopharmaceutical Safety Through Verification‐Based Quality Control
Abstract
Biopharmaceuticals and small-molecule drugs have different approval pathways but the same quality control (QC) paradigm, where the quality of released but untested units is inferred from that of tested but destroyed units. This inference-based QC will likely miss rare prerelease defects, and defects emerging after product release. The likelihood for such defects is heightened for biopharmaceuticals due to their complexity, which makes manufacturing errors more likely, and fragility, which makes postrelease damage more likely. To improve biopharmaceutical safety, we suggest transitioning their QC from inference- to verification-based practice by developing inspection technologies that can nondestructively verify the quality of every vial from the point of release to the point of care. One candidate, water proton NMR (wNMR), is briefly discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Batch testing assumes that all units in a batch are uniform without variability and makes the product release decision based on analysis of one representative unit per batch, increasing the risk of poor-quality drugs.
“(ii) this approach assumes that all the units in a batch are uniform without any variability, and the decision for product release is made based on the analysis of one representative unit for every batch [10]. This increases the risk of the distribution of poor‐quality drugs.”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Most biopharmaceuticals are produced via biosynthesis using genetically modified organisms, unlike small molecules, which are produced through chemical synthesis.
“Unlike small molecules, which are produced through chemical synthesis, most biopharmaceuticals are produced via biosynthesis, using genetically modified organisms [10].”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Batch testing determines quality only after manufacture, leaving limited scope for corrective actions and potentially leading to rejected or failed batches.
“This has two main disadvantages: (i) the quality is only known after the manufacture of the drug, leaving very limited scope for corrective actions, potentially leading to rejected or failed batches”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Biopharmaceuticals are more complex than small molecule drugs, with therapeutic proteins being 50-1000 times larger.
“The drawbacks of the quality by testing (QbT) approach are even more pronounced for biopharmaceuticals, as they are more complex and involve therapeutic proteins being 50–1000 times larger than small molecule drugs.”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
(2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102673 · Cited by 2,669 · see citing works
Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases
Jucker, M., & Walker, L. C. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12481 · Cited by 1,663 · see citing works
Runkel, L., Meier, W., Pepinsky, R. B., Karpusas, M., Whitty, A., Kimball, K., Brickelmaier, M., Muldowney, C., Jones, W., & Goelz, S. E. (1998) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1011974512425 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals
Sathiyapriyan, P., Mukherjee, S., Vogel, T., Essen, L., Boerema, D., Vey, M., & Kalina, U. (2025) · Analytical Science Advances · doi:10.1002/ansa.70013 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yu, Y. B., Taraban, M. B., Wang, W., & Briggs, K. T.
- Venue
- Trends in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1140-1155
- ISSN
- 0167-7799
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- M-CERSI (1U01FD005946)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review