Cited by 86Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

Construction of stable microbial consortia for effective biochemical synthesis

Jiang, Yujia, Wu, Ruofan, Zhang, Wenming, Xin, Fengxue, Jiang, Min·2023·Trends in Biotechnology

Abstract

Microbial consortia can complete otherwise arduous tasks through the cooperation of multiple microbial species. This concept has been applied to produce commodity chemicals, natural products, and biofuels. However, metabolite incompatibility and growth competition can make the microbial composition unstable, and fluctuating microbial populations reduce the efficiency of chemical production. Thus, controlling the populations and regulating the complex interactions between different strains are challenges in constructing stable microbial consortia. This Review discusses advances in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering to control social interactions within microbial cocultures, including substrate separation, byproduct elimination, crossfeeding, and quorum-sensing circuit design. Additionally, this Review addresses interdisciplinary strategies to improve the stability of microbial consortia and provides design principles for microbial consortia to enhance chemical production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.05.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Top-down engineering is an effective method for ecological modification but has limitations due to its inability to accurately control microbial consortia and their complex metabolism, hindering system optimization.

    “Top-down engineering is an effective method for ecological modification and has limitations due to its inability to accurately control microbial consortia and their complex metabolism accurately, hindering system optimization [170].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jiang, Y., Wu, R., Zhang, W., Xin, F., & Jiang, M.
Affiliations
Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Yujia
  • Xin, Fengxue
Venue
Trends in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1430-1441
ISSN
0167-7799 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380880160
Cited by
86
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 19
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Jiangsu National Synergistic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials
  • Taishan Industry Leading Talents
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22008113, 22078151, 22178169)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200683, BK20220052)
  • Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund (CX(21)3120)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0902200)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
microbial consortia, microbial co-culture, growth competition, quorum sensing, synthetic biology, metabolic engineering, microbial interactions, biofuels, commodity chemicals, natural products
MeSH terms
Quorum Sensing, Synthetic Biology, Microbial Consortia, Metabolic Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review