Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure
Open accessAbstract
Self-regulatory failure is a core feature of many social and mental health problems. Self-regulation can be undermined by failures to transcend overwhelming temptations, negative moods and resource depletion, and when minor lapses in self-control snowball into self-regulatory collapse. Cognitive neuroscience research suggests that successful self-regulation is dependent on top-down control from the prefrontal cortex over subcortical regions involved in reward and emotion. We highlight recent neuroimaging research on self-regulatory failure, the findings of which support a balance model of self-regulation whereby self-regulatory failure occurs whenever the balance is tipped in favor of subcortical areas, either due to particularly strong impulses or when prefrontal function itself is impaired. Such a model is consistent with recent findings in the cognitive neuroscience of addictive behavior, emotion regulation and decision-making.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mental health issues are often attributed to failures in emotional regulation.
“Mental health issues are often attributed to failures in emotional regulation [9].”
From Effects of Mindfulness and Life-Skills Training on Emotion Regulation and Anxiety Symptoms in Chinese Migrant Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The Abstract describes self-regulatory failure as a core feature of many mental health problems. The “Regulation of Emotions” section reports disrupted emotion-regulation circuitry in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder, but does not extend that specific finding to mental health issues generally. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 121 · Cited by 1,033
- Authors
- Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heatherton, Todd F.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 132-139
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3062191
- OpenAlex
- W2025996975
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022582)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- self-regulation failure, self-control, prefrontal cortex, top-down control, emotion regulation, addictive behavior, decision-making, impulse control, resource depletion, negative mood
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Cues, Diagnostic Imaging, Emotions, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurosciences, Prejudice, Social Behavior, Social Control, Informal, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review