Cited by 120Embodied and Extended CognitionSocial Robot Interaction and HRISoft Robotics and Applications

Cognition from the bottom up: on biological inspiration, body morphology, and soft materials

Pfeifer, Rolf, Iida, Fumiya, Lungarella, Max·2014·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Traditionally, in cognitive science the emphasis is on studying cognition from a computational point of view. Studies in biologically inspired robotics and embodied intelligence, however, provide strong evidence that cognition cannot be analyzed and understood by looking at computational processes alone, but that physical system-environment interaction needs to be taken into account. In this opinion article, we review recent progress in cognitive developmental science and robotics, and expand the notion of embodiment to include soft materials and body morphology in the big picture. We argue that we need to build our understanding of cognition from the bottom up; that is, all the way from how our body is physically constructed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The capacity for robots to generate adaptive behavior can be facilitated by exploiting their material properties; elasticity can stabilize the body during motion, while compliant properties can allow an effector to adapt to the shape of an object for grasping and manipulation.

    “The capacity for robots to generate adaptive behavior can be facilitated by exploiting their material properties. Elasticity, for instance, can stabilize the body during motion, while compliant properties can allow an effector to adapt to the shape of an object for grasping and manipulation (Pfeifer et al., 2014).”

    From Lessons for Robotics From the Control Architecture of the Octopus (2022) · cites this paper as Pfeifer et al., 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 120

Authors
Pfeifer, R., Iida, F., & Lungarella, M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Pfeifer, Rolf
  • Lungarella, Max
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
404-413
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021057782
Cited by
120
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
embodiment, body morphology, soft materials, bio-inspired robotics, embodied AI, system-environment interaction, cognitive development, cognitive modeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Biological, Perception, Robotics, Software, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review