Interactions between probiotics and pathogenic microorganisms in hosts and foods: A review
Abstract
Foodborne diseases can be highlighted as one of the most significant health concerns among the last decades. Probiotic food products can be considered as the promising approaches for modulating of gastrointestinal (GIT) microbiota due to their interactions within the GIT. However, no comprehensive review regarding the involved mechanisms in inhibiting foodborne pathogens in foods by probiotics, besides their interaction is available.The current article provides an overview considering the interactions between probiotics and pathogens in hosts as well as in foods aiming to gain insights regarding relevant properties to be used in further developments of probiotic-based food products.The interaction between probiotics and pathogens in foods and in the hosts and different mechanism of probiotics in control of enteric pathogens colonization were reviewed in the current study. While the mechanisms of action correlated with probiotic strains in the GIT are diverse and well-studied, their interactions with pathogens in foods is overlooked. Revealing how probiotic strains interact with foodborne pathogens in foods is of key relevance in a contemporary context that demand the development of more robust formulations. Although several mechanisms such as production of substances such as organic acids, bacteriocins, and hydrogen peroxide have been suggested regarding probiotics actions in food matrices, still substantial challenges exist concerning the molecular mode of their antimicrobial action. Additionally, it is required to comprehend the appreciate dose, species, and a combination of probiotics in controlling the pathogens.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A crucial beneficial mechanism of probiotics is the competitive exclusion of pathogens.
“Conversely, a crucial beneficial mechanism of probiotics is the competitive exclusion of pathogens [30].”
From Probiotics Regulate Gut Microbiota: An Effective Method to Improve Immunity (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 166 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Mousavi Khaneghah, A., Abhari, K., Eş, I., Soares, M. B., Oliveira, R. B. A., Hosseini, H., Rezaei, M., Balthazar, C. F., Silva, R., Cruz, A. G., Ranadheera, C. S., & Sant’Ana, A. S.
- Affiliations
- National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute (IR)
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
- University of Tehran (IR)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sant’Ana, Anderson S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 205-218
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991050596
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 166
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 22
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (305804/2017-0, 302763/2014-7)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (13/21544-9)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- probiotics, foodborne pathogens, antimicrobial mechanisms, organic acids, bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide, gut microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review