Cited by 296Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsRNA Research and SplicingEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The biology of intron gain and loss

Jeffares, Daniel C., Mourier, Tobias, Penny, David·2006·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Intron density in eukaryote genomes varies by more than three orders of magnitude, so there must have been extensive intron gain and/or intron loss during evolution. A favored and partial explanation for this range of intron densities has been that introns have accumulated stochastically in large eukaryote genomes during their evolution from an intron-poor ancestor. However, recent studies have shown that some eukaryotes lost many introns, whereas others accumulated and/or gained many introns. In this article, we discuss the growing evidence that these differences are subject to selection acting on introns depending on the biology of the organism and the gene involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2005.10.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intron lengths exhibit substantial biological variation and are less affected by annotation pipeline differences, as intron boundaries are defined by conserved splice sites.

    “In contrast, intron lengths exhibit substantial biological variation and are less affected by annotation pipeline differences, as intron boundaries are defined by conserved splice sites (69, 95, 97, 98).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeffares, D. C., Mourier, T., & Penny, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Allan Wilson Centre (NZ)
Corresponding author
Jeffares, Daniel C.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
16-22
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065548844
Cited by
296
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
intron gain, intron loss, intron density, eukaryotic genomes, intron evolution, genome evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Eukaryotic Cells, Biological Evolution, Humans, Introns, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review