Cited by 207Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

The genetic landscape of intellectual disability arising from chromosome X

Gécz, Jozef, Shoubridge, Cheryl, Corbett, Mark·2009·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

X-linked mental retardation (XLMR) or intellectual disability (ID) is a common, clinically complex and genetically heterogeneous disease arising from many mutations along the X chromosome. It affects between 1/600-1/1000 males and a substantial number of females. Research during the past decade has identified >90 different XLMR genes, affecting a wide range of cellular processes. Many more genes remain uncharacterized, especially for the non-syndromic XLMR forms. Currently, approximately 11% of X-chromosome genes are implicated in XLMR; however, apart from a few notable exceptions, most contribute individually to <0.1% of the total landscape, which arguably remains only about half complete. There remain many hills to climb and valleys to cross before the ID landscape is fully triangulated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2009.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dURV elevation was concentrated in X-linked intellectual disability genes (OR=1.88; 95% CI=1.34-2.64; P=9.5e-4) and developmental disorder genes (OR=1.67; 95% CI=1.31-2.13; P=1.6e-4).

    “We did observe the dURV elevation to be concentrated in X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) genes41,42 (OR=1.88; 95% CI=1.34–2.64; P = 9.5 × 10−4) and in developmental disorder (DD) genes43 (OR=1.67; 95% CI=1.31-2.13; P = 1.6 × 10−4) (Online Methods).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 105 · Cited by 207

Authors
Gécz, J., Shoubridge, C., & Corbett, M.
Affiliations
South Australia Pathology (AU)
Corresponding author
Gécz, Jozef
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
308-316
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985966348
Cited by
207
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
X-linked intellectual disability, X chromosome, genetic heterogeneity, non-syndromic intellectual disability, gene identification
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Genetic Variation, Mental Retardation, X-Linked, X-Linked Intellectual Disability, Chromosomes, Human, X

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review