Actors with Multiple Roles: Pleiotropic Enhancers and the Paradigm of Enhancer Modularity
Abstract
The current paradigm in the field of gene regulation postulates that regulatory information for generating gene expression is organized into modules (enhancers), each containing the information for driving gene expression in a single spatiotemporal context. This modular organization is thought to facilitate the evolution of gene expression by minimizing pleiotropic effects. Here we review recent studies that provide evidence of quite the opposite: (i) enhancers can function in multiple developmental contexts, implying that enhancers can be pleiotropic, (ii) transcription factor binding sites within pleiotropic enhancers are reused in different contexts, and (iii) pleiotropy impacts the structure and evolution of enhancers. Altogether, this evidence suggests that enhancer pleiotropy is pervasive in animal genomes, challenging the commonly held view of modularity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such differences are likely a consequence of the tissue-specificity nature of CREs, and of enhancers in particular.
“Such differences are likely consequence of the tissue-specificity nature of CREs, and of enhancers in particular [69].”
From Denisovan introgression has shaped the immune system of present-day Papuans (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Sabarís, G., Laiker, I., Preger-Ben Noon, E., & Frankel, N.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Frankel, Nicolás
- Venue
- Trends in Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 423-433
- ISSN
- 0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940056144
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- gene expression regulation, enhancer evolution, transcription factor binding sites, developmental context, spatiotemporal gene expression, animal genomes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Organ Specificity, Protein Binding, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription Factors, Genome, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Evolution, Molecular, Genetic Loci
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review