Cited by 314Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Therapy for fungal diseases: opportunities and priorities

Open access
Denning, David W., Hope, William W.·2010·Trends in Microbiology

Abstract

This article provides a perspective on the current status of drug therapy for invasive fungal diseases, together with priorities for the future development of novel compounds. Key opportunities for new drugs include production of orally bioavailable agents for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis and mucosal and urinary Candida infections. Orally bioavailable agents for the treatment of chronic pulmonary and allergic aspergillosis are also required, as well as new potent drugs against a range of medically important moulds. Antifungal resistance is a problem in certain contexts, but is generally less of a problem than bacterial infections. Earlier and more complete mycological diagnosis and improvements in underlying risk estimation will improve outcomes. The limitations of the current antifungal agents and opportunities for new developments are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tim.2010.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 314

Authors
Denning, D. W., & Hope, W. W.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Denning, David W.
Venue
Trends in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
195-204
ISSN
0966-842X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969289841
Cited by
314
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Trends in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
invasive fungal infections, antifungal drug development, invasive aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, mold infections, antifungal resistance, oral bioavailability, mycological diagnosis, risk estimation
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Mycoses, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Biomedical Research, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review