Memory retention – the synaptic stability versus plasticity dilemma
Abstract
Memory maintenance is widely believed to involve long-term retention of the synaptic weights that are set within relevant neural circuits during learning. However, despite recent exciting technical advances, it has not yet proved possible to confirm experimentally this intuitively appealing hypothesis. Artificial neural networks offer an alternative methodology as they permit continuous monitoring of individual connection weights during learning and retention. In such models, ongoing alterations in connection weights are required if a network is to retain previously stored material while learning new information. Thus, the duration of synaptic change does not necessarily define the persistence of a memory; rather, it is likely that a regulated balance of synaptic stability and synaptic plasticity is required for optimal memory retention in real neuronal circuits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difficulty of simultaneously meeting plasticity and stability requirements is called the stability-plasticity dilemma.
“This phenomenon is called the stability-plasticity dilemma [5].”
From An Appraisal of Incremental Learning Methods (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 353
- Authors
- Abraham, W. C., & Robins, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Abraham, Wickliffe C.
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-78
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143386621
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Otago
- Health Research Council of New Zealand
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- memory retention, synaptic stability, synaptic plasticity, long-term memory, artificial neural networks, connection weights, memory maintenance, learning and retention
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Memory, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Long-Term Potentiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review