Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach
Open accessAbstract
Despite anecdotal evidence suggesting conscious states in a variety of non-human animals, no systematic neuroscientific investigation of animal consciousness has yet been undertaken. We set forth a framework for such an investigation that incorporates integration of data from neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and behavioral studies, uses evidence from humans as a benchmark, and recognizes the critical role of explicit verbal report of conscious experiences in human studies. We illustrate our framework with reference to two subphyla: one relatively near to mammals - birds - and one quite far -cephalopod molluscs. Consistent with the possibility of conscious states, both subphyla exhibit complex behavior and possess sophisticated nervous systems. Their further investigation may reveal common phyletic conditions and neural substrates underlying the emergence of animal consciousness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is debate about the presence or possibility of consciousness in nonhuman animals, neural organoids, AI systems, and xenobots.
“There is also debate about the presence or possibility of consciousness in nonhuman animals [16 -21], neural organoids [22 -24], AI systems [25 -29], and xenobots [30,31].”
From Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Edelman, D. B., & Seth, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Neurosciences Institute (US)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Edelman, David B.
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 476-484
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142452004
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G007543/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- animal consciousness, synthetic approaches, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, animal behavior, birds, cephalopods, Mollusca, evolution of consciousness
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Birds, Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Mollusca, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review