Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing
Abstract
Sensory systems must rely on powerful mechanisms for organizing complex information. We propose a framework in which inhibitory alpha oscillations limit and prioritize neuronal processing. At oscillatory peaks, inhibition prevents neuronal firing. As the inhibition ramps down within a cycle, a set of neuronal representations will activate sequentially according to their respective excitability. Both top-down and bottom-up drives determine excitability; in particular, spatial attention is a major top-down influence. On a shorter time scale, fast recurrent inhibition segments representations in slots 10-30 ms apart, generating gamma-band activity at the population level. The proposed mechanism serves to convert spatially distributed representations in early visual regions to a temporal phase code: that is, 'to-do lists' that can be processed sequentially by downstream regions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuronal synchronization has been proposed as a key mechanism in communicating information from one brain area to another and to play a vital role in memory as well as attention.
“Neuronal synchronization has been proposed as a key mechanism in communicating information from one brain area to another (Fries, 2005) and to play a vital role in memory (Fell & Axmacher, 2011) as well as attention (Jensen, Gips, Bergmann, & Bonnefond, 2014).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Jensen, Gips, Bergmann, & Bonnefond, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 119 · Cited by 389
- Authors
- Jensen, O., Gips, B., Bergmann, T. O., & Bonnefond, M.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Ole
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 357-369
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142738004
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- alpha oscillations, gamma oscillations, temporal coding, recurrent inhibition, spatial attention, top-down control, neuronal excitability, visual processing, phase coding, oscillatory coupling, early visual cortex
- MeSH terms
- Alpha Rhythm, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Gamma Rhythm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review