Cited by 389Neural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing

Jensen, Ole, Gips, Bart, Bergmann, Til Ole, Bonnefond, Mathilde·2014·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Sensory systems must rely on powerful mechanisms for organizing complex information. We propose a framework in which inhibitory alpha oscillations limit and prioritize neuronal processing. At oscillatory peaks, inhibition prevents neuronal firing. As the inhibition ramps down within a cycle, a set of neuronal representations will activate sequentially according to their respective excitability. Both top-down and bottom-up drives determine excitability; in particular, spatial attention is a major top-down influence. On a shorter time scale, fast recurrent inhibition segments representations in slots 10-30 ms apart, generating gamma-band activity at the population level. The proposed mechanism serves to convert spatially distributed representations in early visual regions to a temporal phase code: that is, 'to-do lists' that can be processed sequentially by downstream regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuronal synchronization has been proposed as a key mechanism in communicating information from one brain area to another and to play a vital role in memory as well as attention.

    “Neuronal synchronization has been proposed as a key mechanism in communicating information from one brain area to another (Fries, 2005) and to play a vital role in memory (Fell & Axmacher, 2011) as well as attention (Jensen, Gips, Bergmann, & Bonnefond, 2014).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Jensen, Gips, Bergmann, & Bonnefond, 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 119 · Cited by 389

Authors
Jensen, O., Gips, B., Bergmann, T. O., & Bonnefond, M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Ole
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
357-369
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142738004
Cited by
389
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
alpha oscillations, gamma oscillations, temporal coding, recurrent inhibition, spatial attention, top-down control, neuronal excitability, visual processing, phase coding, oscillatory coupling, early visual cortex
MeSH terms
Alpha Rhythm, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Gamma Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review