Cited by 165Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHallucinations in medical conditions

Translating the MAM model of psychosis to humans

Open access
Modinos, Gemma, Allen, Paul, Grace, Anthony A., McGuire, Philip·2015·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Elevated dopamine function and alterations in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structure and function are two of the most robust findings in schizophrenia, but how interactions between these abnormalities underlie the onset of psychosis is unclear. The methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) rodent model proposes that psychosis develops as a result of a perturbation of MTL function, leading to elevated striatal dopamine dysfunction. Here, we review several recent neuroimaging studies that examine components of the putative model in humans with an ultra high risk (UHR) of the psychosis. While data from these studies are broadly consistent with the MAM model, caution is required when comparing data across animal and human studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2014.12.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both MAM and NVHL models reproduce some of the defects observed in schizophrenia, including functional deficits in PV+ fast spiking interneurons.

    “Both models reproduce some of the defects observed in schizophrenia, including functional deficits in PV+ fast spiking interneurons.”
  • These models are primarily based on pharmacological lesions of the developing hippocampus, such as the prenatal exposure to MAM and the NVHL models.

    “These are primarily based on pharmacological lesions of the developing hippocampus, such as the prenatal exposure to methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) and the neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion (NVHL) models 55,56 .”
  • Changes in dopaminergic neurons might be secondary to the disruption of cortical circuits in the MAM model.

    “and studies in the MAM model have shown that the changes in dopaminergic neurons might be secondary to the disruption of cortical circuits 56 .”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 140 · Cited by 165

Authors
Modinos, G., Allen, P., Grace, A. A., & McGuire, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Modinos, Gemma
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
129-138
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035872682
Cited by
165
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Wellcome Trust (091667)
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01mh057440-26a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH057440, R37MH057440)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
psychosis, schizophrenia, clinical high risk for psychosis, medial temporal lobe, dopamine, animal-to-human translation, transition to psychosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Methylazoxymethanol Acetate, Psychotic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review