Making Dopamine Connections in Adolescence
Open accessAbstract
A dramatic maturational process ongoing in adolescence is prefrontal cortex development, including its dopamine innervation. Dopamine axons grow from the striatum to the prefrontal cortex, the only known case of long-distance axon growth during adolescence. This is coordinated by the Netrin-1 guidance cue receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), which in turn controls the intrinsic development of the prefrontal cortex itself. Stimulant drugs in adolescence alter DCC in dopamine neurons and, in turn prefrontal cortex maturation, impacting cognitive abilities. Variations in DCC expression are linked to psychiatric conditions of prefrontal cortex dysfunction, and microRNA regulation of DCC may be key to determining adolescent vulnerability or resilience. Since early interventions are proving to effectively ameliorate disease outcome, the Netrin-1 system is a promising therapeutic target.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A highly pleiotropic effect of variation in DCC on diverse psychiatric disorders with childhood and adolescent onset would be consistent with its role in early organization of neuronal circuits and maturation of mesolimbic dopaminergic connections to the prefrontal cortex during adolescence.
“A highly pleiotropic effect of variation in DCC on diverse psychiatric disorders with childhood and adolescent onset would be consistent with its role in both early organization of neuronal circuits and the maturation of mesolimbic dopaminergic connections to the prefrontal cortex during adolescence (Hoops and Flores, 2017; Reynolds et al., 2018; Vosberg et al., 2018).”
From Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Hoops and Flores, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 91 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- Hoops, D., & Flores, C.
- Affiliations
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Flores, Cecilia
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 709-719
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5705341
- OpenAlex
- W2762025518
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA037911)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-74709)
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2982226)
- Quebec Nature and Technology Research Fund (208332)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine innervation, prefrontal cortex maturation, adolescence, netrin-1, DCC receptor, axon guidance, stimulants, cognitive development, mental illness, microRNA regulation, early intervention, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Animals, Brain, Dopamine, Humans, Neural Pathways, Sexual Maturation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review