Emerging New Concepts of Degrader Technologies
Open accessAbstract
Traditional drug discovery focuses on identifying direct inhibitors of target proteins. This typically relies on a measurable biochemical readout and accessible binding sites whose occupancy influences the function of the target protein. These requirements preclude many disease-causing proteins from being 'druggable' targets, and these proteins are categorized as 'undruggable'. The proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology provides powerful tools to degrade these undruggable targets and has become a promising approach for drug discovery. However, the PROTAC technology has some limitations, and emerging new degrader technologies may greatly broaden the spectrum of targets that could be selectively degraded by harnessing a second major degradation pathway in cells. We review key emerging technologies that exploit the lysosomal degradation pathway and discuss their potential applications and limitations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The success of PROTACs in hijacking the UPS for TPD has motivated research into other classes of heterobifunctional molecules that depend on non-UPS pathways to degrade a POI.
“The success of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) in hijacking the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) for targeted protein degradation (TPD) has motivated research into other classes of heterobifunctional molecules that depend on non-UPS pathways to degrade a protein of interest (POI)246,247.”
From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [246]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 204
- Authors
- Ding, Y., Fei, Y., & Lu, B.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ding, Yu
- Fei, Yiyan
- Lu, Boxun
- Venue
- Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 464-474
- ISSN
- 0165-6147 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7177145
- OpenAlex
- W3017485915
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Academy of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- PROTACs, undruggable targets, protein degradation, drug discovery, targeted protein degradation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Proteins, Technology, Drug Discovery, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review