Phase II enzyme levels in HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes and their induction in HepG2 cells
Abstract
The HepG2 cell line is a valuable tool for screening for cytotoxicity in the early phase of pharmaceutical development. Some compounds which produce reactive and toxic metabolites, are classified as being toxic in HepG2 cells. In contrast, other compounds, which are toxic in primary human hepatocytes, are not toxic in HepG2 cells. A difference in metabolism between HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes might be the reason. To investigate this, cytochrome P450 and Phase II enzyme levels were characterized. In the present study the focus is on Phase II enzyme metabolism. Transcript levels of UDP-glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs), sulfotransferases (SULTs), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), N-acetyltransferase-1 (NAT1) and epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) were measured with quantitative PCR in HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes. Levels of SULT1A1, 1A2, 1E1, 1A2, and 2A1, microsomal GST 1, GST mu1, NAT1, and EPHX1 in HepG2 cells were almost similar to levels in primary human hepatocytes. In contrast, levels of UGT1A1 and 1A6 transcripts were between 10- and more than 1000-fold higher in the primary hepatocytes. The regulatory processes of Phase II enzymes by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor were studied in HepG2 cells and appeared quite similar to those in primary human hepatocytes. Due to the involvement of Phase II enzymes in the toxication of some compounds, HepG2 cells can be a valuable cellular system to predict toxicity for these compounds. On the other hand, the normal expression of most Phase II enzymes in combination with the lower expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in HepG2 cells might result in an underestimation of toxicity for several compounds. Compared to primary human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells are a relatively easy-to-handle tool to study the up-regulation of Phase II enzymes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In HepG2, Phase II biotransformation is partially preserved and on average better than Phase I, but qualitatively shifted.
“Thus, in HepG2, Phase II biotransformation is partially preserved and, on average, better than Phase I, but it is qualitatively shifted.”
From The HepG2 Cell Line as a Model for Studying Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Westerink, W. M. A., & Schoonen, W. G. E. J.
- Affiliations
- Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Westerink, Walter M.A.
- Venue
- Toxicology in Vitro
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1592-1602
- ISSN
- 0887-2333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4238706709
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology in Vitro (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- HepG2 cells, primary human hepatocytes, phase II enzymes, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase, sulfotransferase, glutathione S-transferase, NAT1, epoxide hydrolase, gene expression, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, enzyme induction, hepatotoxicity prediction, drug metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review