Cited by 25Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryContact Dermatitis and AllergiesAnimal testing and alternatives

Parallel evaluation of alternative skin barrier models and excised human skin for dermal absorption studies in vitro

Open access
Salminen, Alec T., Davis, Kelly J., Felton, Robert P., Nischal, Nathania, VonTungeln, Linda S., Beland, Frederick A., Derr, Kristy, Brown, Paul C. +9 more·2023·Toxicology in Vitro

Abstract

Skin permeation is a primary consideration in the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients, topical drugs, and human users handling veterinary medicinal products. While excised human skin (EHS) remains the 'gold standard' for in vitro permeation testing (IVPT) studies, unreliable supply and high cost motivate the search for alternative skin barrier models. In this study, a standardized dermal absorption testing protocol was developed to evaluate the suitability of alternative skin barrier models to predict skin absorption in humans. Under this protocol, side-by-side assessments of a commercially available reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) model (EpiDerm-200-X, MatTek), a synthetic barrier membrane (Strat-M, Sigma-Aldrich), and EHS were performed. The skin barrier models were mounted on Franz diffusion cells and the permeation of caffeine, salicylic acid, and testosterone was quantified. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and histology of the biological models were also compared. EpiDerm-200-X exhibited native human epidermis-like morphology, including a characteristic stratum corneum, but had an elevated TEWL as compared to EHS. The mean 6 h cumulative permeation of a finite dose (6 nmol/cm 2) of caffeine and testosterone was highest in EpiDerm-200-X, followed by EHS and Strat-M. Salicylic acid permeated most in EHS, followed by EpiDerm-200-X and Strat-M. Overall, evaluating novel alternative skin barrier models in the manner outlined herein has the potential to reduce the time from basic science discovery to regulatory impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105630

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HEE models offer dependable substitutes for in vitro permeation testing studies.

    “For instance, the HEE models offer dependable substitutes for in vitro permeation testing studies, a domain historically plagued by the unpredictable availability and exorbitant cost associated with excised human skin [26].”

    From Diversity of human skin three-dimensional organotypic cultures (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction (§2) says the tested alternative models differ greatly in their ability to model permeation through excised human skin. The Discussion (§5) concludes that alternative models require continued improvement before they can predict permeation across human skin, contrary to calling them dependable substitutes. The paper does support the separate point that excised human skin has limited availability and high cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [3]3. Gilaberte Y, Prieto-Torres L, Pastushenko I, and Juarranz Á, Anatomy and function of the skin, in Nanoscience in Dermatology, Hamblin MR, Avci P, and Prow TW, Editors. 2016, Academic Press: Boston. p. 1-14.
  2. [4]4. DeLuca M, Tamura RN, Kajiji S, Bondanza S, Rossino P, Cancedda R, Marchisio PC, and Quaranta V, Polarized integrin mediates human keratinocyte adhesion to basal lamina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990. 87(17): p. 6888-6892.
  3. [8]8. Chang RK, Raw A, Lionberger R, and Yu L, Generic development of topical dermatologic products: formulation development, process development, and testing of topical dermatologic products. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Journal, 2013. 15(1): p. 41-52. [PubMed: 23054971]
  4. [10]10. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Buist H, Craig P, Dewhurst I, Hougaard Bennekou S, Kneuer C, Machera K, Pieper C, Court Marques D, Guillot G, Ruffo F, and Chiusolo A, Guidance on dermal absorption. European Food Safety Authority Journal, 2017. 15(6): p. 4873.
  5. [11]11. Polak S, Ghobadi C, Mishra H, Ahamadi M, Patel N, Jamei M, and Rostami-Hodjegan A, Prediction of concentration-time profile and its inter-individual variability following the dermal drug absorption. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2012. 101(7): p. 2584-2595. [PubMed: 22517028]
  6. [12]12. Settivari RS, Ball N, Murphy L, Rasoulpour R, Boverhof DR, and Carney EW, Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 2015. 54(2): p. 214223. [PubMed: 25836969]
  7. [15]15. Friend DR, In vitro skin permeation techniques. Journal of Controlled Release, 1992. 18(3): p. 235-248.
  8. [29]29. Farahmand S and Maibach HI, Estimating skin permeability from physicochemical characteristics of drugs: A comparison between conventional models and an in vivo-based approach. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2009. 375(1): p. 41-47. [PubMed: 19481689]
  9. [36]36. Lau WM and Ng KW, Finite and infinite dosing, in Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers Drug Penetration Into/Through the Skin: Methodology and General Considerations, Dragicevic N and Maibach HI, Editors. 2017, Springer-Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin. p. 35-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salminen, A. T., Davis, K. J., Felton, R. P., Nischal, N., VonTungeln, L. S., Beland, F. A., Derr, K., Brown, P. C., Ferrer, M., Katz, L. M., Kleinstreuer, N. C., Leshin, J., Manga, P., Sadrieh, N., Xia, M., Fitzpatrick, S. C., & Camacho, L.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Center for Veterinary Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Camacho, Luísa
Venue
Toxicology in Vitro
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
91
Pages
105630
ISSN
0887-2333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380358984
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicology in Vitro (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
excised human skin, reconstructed human epidermis, percutaneous absorption, skin permeation, caffeine, salicylic acid, testosterone, transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum, Franz diffusion cell, cosmetic ingredients, topical drugs
MeSH terms
Caffeine, Epidermis, Humans, Skin, Skin Absorption, Testosterone, Water, Salicylic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review