Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery--a systemic review
Open accessAbstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Women with POP often experience pelvic discomfort, urinary and fecal problems, sexual dysfunction, and an overall decrease in their quality of life. Surgical treatment is a feasible option if conservative management fails. Various surgical techniques have been proposed to correct POP with or without the use of graft material. Owing to recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration warnings about mesh-related complications, sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF), as a traditional vaginal procedure, may play an important role again. To answer this question and evaluate quantitatively the efficacy of SSF in POP, we conducted a systemic review of the available data about SSF and POP. Interventions had to include SSF as a point of attachment. To eliminate confounding bias and effect modification, at least one arm must include SSF without mesh or graft. All follow-up periods were allowed. Information on the following parameters was extracted and entered into a database: study design, type of intervention, number of patients, follow-up in months, cure rate, recurrence rate, intra/postoperative complications, and/or uni/bilateral, preventive/therapeutic, or concomitant procedures. Published papers from the years 1995 to 2011 were selected for analysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sacrospinous ligament fixation is a safe, low-cost, and effective procedure in the management of apical prolapse.
“Studies have shown sacrospinous ligament fixation as a safe, low-cost, and effective procedure in the management of apical prolapse [9,14-17].”
From Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors for Apical Prolapse After Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Prospective Cohort Study (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The Introduction describes fewer complications and greater cost effectiveness for sacrospinous ligament suspension, and identifies its use for apical support. The Discussion calls it a well-documented means of correcting prolapse. Greater cost effectiveness, however, does not establish that the procedure is low-cost in absolute terms. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Hewson AD. Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1998;38:318e32.
- Lantzsch T, Goepel C, Wolters M, Koelbl H, Methfessel HD. Sacrospi- nous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001;265:21e5.
- Estrade JP, Agostini A, Roger V, Dallay D, Blanc B, Cravello L. Post- hysterectomy prolapse: results of sacrospinous ligament fixation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2005;34:481e7.
- Petri E, Ashok K. Sacrospinous vaginal fixationdcurrent status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:429e36.
- Authors
- Tseng, L.-H., Chen, I., Chang, S.-D., & Lee, C.-L.
- Affiliations
- Chang Gung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Chyi-Long
- Venue
- Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-317
- ISSN
- 1028-4559 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973372881
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- sacrospinous ligament fixation, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor surgery, mesh complications, prolapse recurrence, cure rate, postoperative complications, women's health
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Ligaments, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review