Cited by 216Blood transfusion and managementTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationBlood groups and transfusion

Appropriateness of Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Transfusion: The International Consensus Conference on Transfusion Outcomes

Shander, Aryeh, Fink, Arlene, Javidroozi, Mazyar, Erhard, Jochen, Farmer, Shannon L., Corwin, Howard, Goodnough, Lawrence Tim, Hofmann, Axel +3 more·2011·Transfusion Medicine Reviews

Abstract

An international multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts reviewed 494 published articles and used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to determine the appropriateness of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion based on its expected impact on outcomes of stable nonbleeding patients in 450 typical inpatient medical, surgical, or trauma scenarios. Panelists rated allogeneic RBC transfusion as appropriate in 53 of the scenarios (11.8%), inappropriate in 267 (59.3%), and uncertain in 130 (28.9%). Red blood cell transfusion was most often rated appropriate (81%) in scenarios featuring patients with hemoglobin (Hb) level 7.9 g/dL or less, associated comorbidities, and age older than 65 years. Red blood cell transfusion was rated inappropriate in all scenarios featuring patients with Hb level 10 g/dL or more and in 71.3% of scenarios featuring patients with Hb level 8 to 9.9 g/dL. Conversely, no scenario with patient's Hb level of 8 g/dL or more was rated as appropriate. Nearly one third of all scenarios were rated uncertain, indicating the need for more research. The observation that allogeneic RBC transfusions were rated as either inappropriate or uncertain in most scenarios in this study supports a more judicious transfusion strategy. In addition, the large number of scenarios in which RBC transfusions were rated as uncertain can serve as a road map to identify areas in need of further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.02.001

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shander, A., Fink, A., Javidroozi, M., Erhard, J., Farmer, S. L., Corwin, H., Goodnough, L. T., Hofmann, A., Isbister, J., Ozawa, S., & Spahn, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Englewood Hospital and Medical Center (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Shander, Aryeh
Venue
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
232-246.e53
ISSN
0887-7963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069058457
Cited by
216
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 14
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transfusion Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood groups and transfusion
Keywords
allogeneic red blood cell transfusion, transfusion appropriateness, hemoglobin threshold, transfusion thresholds, comorbidities, elderly patients, transfusion outcomes, expert consensus
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Humans, International Cooperation, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Transplantation, Homologous, Treatment Outcome, Erythrocyte Transfusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review