Ideal animals and animal traits for zoos: General public perspectives
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
'Displays of intelligence' was regarded by the public in the UK as one of the most important traits that they wanted to see in a zoo animal.
“'displays of intelligence' was regarded by the public in the UK as one of the most important traits that they wanted to see in a zoo animal (Carr, 2016).”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Carr, 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Carr, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Carr, Neil
- ORCID
- Carr, Neil
- Venue
- Tourism Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 37-44
- ISSN
- 0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2418783558
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Durrell Wildlife Park
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- zoo animals, public preferences, threatened species, animal intelligence, large mammals, Jersey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
