The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0082 · Cited by 12,223
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,720
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000011 · Cited by 6,372
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6804 · Cited by 3,630
Cited by
Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631
Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis
Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.012 · Cited by 546
Theory building with big data-driven research–Moving away from the “What” towards the “Why”
Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102205 · Cited by 301
Machine learning algorithms for social media analysis: A survey
T.K., B., Annavarapu, C. S. R., & Bablani, A. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100395 · Cited by 276
Business Open Big Data Analytics to Support Innovative Leadership and Management Decision in Canada
Delanoy, N., & Kasztelnik, A. (2020) · Business Ethics and Leadership · doi:10.21272/bel.4(2).56-74.2020 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, Z., Du, Q., Ma, Y., & Fan, W.
- Venue
- Tourism Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 51-65
- ISSN
- 0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2539161094
- Cited by
- 1,051
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 159.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.001
- The paper
- Xiang, Z., Du, Q., Ma, Y., & Fan, W. (2017). A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
