The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do people share their travel experiences on social media?
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Tourism practices and destination decisions are more and more affected by the opinions of trusted friends channeled through social media, and it is therefore of great interest to explore the role that this plays in the travel context. It is also valuable to understand the behaviour of people commonly known as “lurkers”, who travel but do not share their experiences with others. We draw on social influence theory and its three constructs – identification, internalization, and compliance, as well as the users’ personality, to investigate these issues. Based on 381 responses, findings reveal two dominant reasons: first, perceived enjoyment was the most important motive for travellers to share their travel experiences on online networks and travel websites. Second, security and privacy issues are the top latent reasons. This study extends the tourism literature by combining all online behaviours into one single model. We also provide suggestions for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · cited 2×
“…(e.g. love and belonging), followed by self-esteem needs (e.g. to feel respected and to enjoy status within society), and last, reaching the top of the hierarchy, where the needs of self-actualization are met – realizing individual potential, self-fulfilment, and personal growth (Maslow, 1943).”
BackgroundBack-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091 · cited 1×
“The questionnaire was back-translated into English by a different translator to ensure semantic equivalence (Brislin, 1970).”
MethodExtrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 1×
“The social influence theory and the perceived enjoyment concept (Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1992) have been used to explain group and collective behaviour.”
BackgroundWho interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 · Cited by 1,915
Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade
Kuss, D., Griffiths, M., Karila, L., & Billieux, J. (2014) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/13816128113199990617 · Cited by 1,374
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?
Khan, M. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024 · Cited by 1,180
Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns
Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006 · Cited by 987
Filieri, R., Alguezaui, S., & McLeay, F. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.007 · Cited by 882
Cited by
Pop, R.-A., Săplăcan, Z., Dabija, D.-C., & Alt, M.-A. (2022) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2021.1895729 · Cited by 702
Hossain, R., Al- Amin, A. A., Mani, L., Islam, M. M., Poli, T. A., & Milon, M. N. U. (2024) · WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS · doi:10.37394/23207.2024.21.114 · Cited by 16
Wan, Y. N., & Forey, G. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1502.05 · Cited by 5
Majeed, M., Tijani, A., Ofori, K. S., Abubakari, A., & Ampong, G. O. A. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2457230 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, T., Araujo, B., & Tam, C.
- Venue
- Tourism Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 104041
- ISSN
- 0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2781827742
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 59.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.