Cited by 57Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Microgram-order ammonium perfluorooctanoate may activate mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α, but not human PPARα

Open access
Nakamura, Toshiki, Ito, Yuki, Yanagiba, Yukie, Ramdhan, Doni Hikmat, Kono, Yasuhide, Naito, Hisao, Hayashi, Yumi, Li, Yufei +3 more·2009·Toxicology

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha, which exhibits marked species differences in expression and function, especially between rodents and humans. We investigated the functional difference in PFOA response between mice and humans, using a humanized PPARalpha transgenic mouse line. Three genotyped mice, 129/Sv wild-type (mPPARalpha), Pparalpha-null mice and humanized PPARalpha (hPPARalpha) mice (8-week-old males) were divided into three groups: the first was treated with water daily for 2 weeks by gavage (control group), and the remaining two groups were treated with 0.1 and 0.3mg/kg ammonium perflurooctanate (APFO), respectively, for 2 weeks by gavage. The APFO dosages used did not influence the plasma triglyceride or total cholesterol levels in any mouse line, but the high dose increased both hepatic lipid levels only in mPPARalpha mice. APFO increased mRNA and/or protein levels of PPARalpha target genes cytochrome P450 Cyp4a10, peroxisomal thiolase and bifunctional protein only in the liver of mPPARalpha mice, but not in Pparalpha-null or hPPARalpha mice. This chemical also increased expression of mitochondrial very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase only in the liver of mPPARalpha mice. Taken together, human PPARalpha may be less responsive to PFOA than that of mice when a relatively low dose is applied. This information may be very valuable in considering whether PFOA influences the lipid metabolism in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of PPARα target genes by APFO is prominently observed in the liver of mice with mouse PPARα, whereas such effects are notably absent in mice lacking PPARα or possessing human PPARα.

    “Specifically, activation of PPARα target genes by ammonium perflurooctanate (APFO) is prominently observed in the liver of mice with mouse PPARα, whereas such effects are notably absent in mice lacking PPARα or possessing human PPARα [34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 57

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kennedy GL Jr. Butenhoff JL Olsen GW O’Connor JC Seacat AM Perkins RG Biegel LB Murphy SR Farrar DG The toxicology of perfluorooc-tanoate Crit. Rev. Toxicol 2004 34 351 384 15328768

Authors
Nakamura, T., Ito, Y., Yanagiba, Y., Ramdhan, D. H., Kono, Y., Naito, H., Hayashi, Y., Li, Y., Aoyama, T., Gonzalez, F. J., & Nakajima, T.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Shinshu University (JP)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Nakajima, Tamie
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
265
Issue
1-2
Pages
27-33
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976699926
Cited by
57
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Cancer Institute (ZIABC005708)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
perfluorooctanoic acid, ammonium perfluorooctanoate, PPARα, species differences, PPARα target genes, Cyp4a10, hepatic lipid metabolism, VLCAD
MeSH terms
Alanine Transaminase, Animals, Biotransformation, Body Weight, Caprylates, Cell Nucleus, Cricetulus, Female, Fluorocarbons, Cricetinae, Humans, Lipids, Male, Organ Size, RNA, Messenger, Species Specificity, Blotting, Western, Gene Expression, CHO Cells, Mice, Knockout, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, PPAR alpha, Lipid Metabolism, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review