The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging plant growth in 4D: robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution
Fernandez, R., Das, P., Mirabet, V., Moscardi, E., Traas, J., Verdeil, J.-L., Malandain, G., & Godin, C. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1472 · Cited by 305
Self-citationNew Insights Into Tissue Culture Plant-Regeneration Mechanisms
Long, Y., Yang, Y., Pan, G., & Shen, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.926752 · Cited by 270
Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration
Bidabadi, S. S., & Jain, S. M. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060702 · Cited by 268
Neelakandan, A. K., & Wang, K. (2012) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1202-z · Cited by 254
Stress-induced chromatin changes: A critical view on their heritability
Pecinka, A., & Mittelsten Scheid, O. (2012) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcs044 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- VERDEIL, J., ALEMANNO, L., NIEMENAK, N., & TRANBARGER, T.
- Venue
- Trends in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 245-252
- ISSN
- 1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027140769
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002
- The paper
- VERDEIL, J., ALEMANNO, L., NIEMENAK, N., & TRANBARGER, T. (2007). Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
