The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Pest Management
Open accessAbstract
The concept of integrated pest management (IPM) has been accepted and incorporated in public policies and regulations in the European Union and elsewhere, but a holistic science of IPM has not yet been developed. Hence, current IPM programs may often be considerably less efficient than the sum of separately applied individual crop protection actions. Thus, there is a clear need to formulate general principles for synergistically combining traditional and novel IPM actions to improve efforts to optimize plant protection solutions. This paper addresses this need by presenting a conceptual framework for a modern science of IPM. The framework may assist attempts to realize the full potential of IPM and reduce risks of deficiencies in the implementation of new policies and regulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., & Gurr, G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175 · Cited by 3,100
Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Emmett Duffy, J., Wright, J. P., Downing, A. L., Sankaran, M., & Jouseau, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05202 · Cited by 1,871
Genetic diversity and disease control in rice
Zhu, Y., Chen, H., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021046 · Cited by 1,619
The Use of Push-Pull Strategies in Integrated Pest Management
Cook, S. M., Khan, Z. R., & Pickett, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407 · Cited by 1,572
Vegetational Diversity and Arthropod Population Response
Andow, D. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003021 · Cited by 1,438
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosch, R., & Hagen, K. S. (1959) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v29n02p081 · Cited by 1,218
Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres
Tabashnik, B. E., Brévault, T., & Carrière, Y. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2597 · Cited by 1,086
Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Langenbach, C. J. G., & Jaskiewicz, M. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120132 · Cited by 1,060
Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management
Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P., & Cork, A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y · Cited by 1,050
The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA
Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovič, M., Le Rhun, A., & Charpentier, E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17945 · Cited by 988
Cited by
When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications
Stenberg, J. A., Sundh, I., Becher, P. G., Björkman, C., Dubey, M., Egan, P. A., Friberg, H., Gil, J. F., Jensen, D. F., Jonsson, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7 · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stenberg, J. A.
- Venue
- Trends in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 759-769
- ISSN
- 1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2734123382
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Pest Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.06.010
- The paper
- Stenberg, J. A. (2017). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Pest Management. Trends in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.06.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
