Cited by 78Transportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic control and managementTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Optimal traffic management policies for mixed human and automated traffic flows

Bahrami, Sina, Roorda, Matthew J.·2020·Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bahrami, S., & Roorda, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bahrami, Sina
Venue
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
135
Pages
130-143
ISSN
0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012310637
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, mixed traffic, traffic management policy, user equilibrium, link capacity, traffic congestion, network performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review